Pet classrooms in Korea: a discussion lesson on animals in schools, for middle schoolers who've already seen the hamster cage
A 45-minute debate lesson built on Korea's recent push to bring therapy animals and class pets into elementary and middle schools. Students argue real trade-offs: allergies, cleanup, learning responsibility, and whether a rabbit actually makes anyone study harder.
Park English · 2026-08-26 · 2 min read
Print it out
No sign-up, no email. Opens a clean print page.
In late 2023, a few Seoul-area elementary schools started pilot programs putting small animals—rabbits, hamsters, fish—into homeroom classrooms. The idea came from research suggesting that caring for a class pet improves empathy and reduces test anxiety. By spring 2024, the proposal expanded: some education officials floated making "pet-friendly classrooms" standard in public schools, with teachers trained to supervise animal care as part of the curriculum.
Your middle schoolers have opinions. Some kept goldfish at home and watched them die in a week. Some have younger siblings whose elementary class already has a hamster. A few are allergic. This lesson gives them structure to argue it out in English.
What you need
- 40 to 50 minutes
- A whiteboard
- Printed handout (one per student, or one between two)
- Students in pairs or small groups
How to run it
5 minutes: introduce the scenario Write "Class Pet Program" on the board. Ask: "Has anyone's brother or sister had an animal in their classroom?" Let two or three answer briefly in Korean if they need to, then switch to English. Explain that some schools in Seoul are testing this now, and the government is deciding whether all schools should do it.
10 minutes: present both sides Hand out the sheet. Read the "Reasons For" column aloud, or have students read one reason each. Do the same with "Reasons Against." Make sure they understand "allergy," "responsibility," and "distraction." Write those three words on the board with quick definitions.
15 minutes: group debate prep Split the class in half. One side prepares arguments FOR pets in classrooms, the other AGAINST. They can use the handout reasons, or add their own. Walk between groups and push them to be specific: not "it's good for students," but "students learn to feed something every day." Not "it's dirty," but "who cleans the cage during vacation?"
10 minutes: debate Each side presents. Set a timer: two minutes per side, then one-minute rebuttals. If the class is large, pick three speakers per side instead of letting everyone talk. The rest listen and tally points on paper.
5 minutes: vote and wrap Poll the class: if the principal asked you today, would you want a class pet? Count hands. Then ask one student from each side why they voted that way. Done.
What actually happens
The allergies point always comes up, because at least two students per class have dust or pet allergies and know it. The "who cleans it during vacation" question splits the room—some assume the teacher does everything, others have seen their homeroom teacher refuse to water a plant. Let that friction happen. The goal is not consensus, it's sentences.
If you have extra time
Add a compromise round: what KIND of pet, and what rules? A fish tank vs. a rabbit vs. a hamster changes the whole argument. Let them propose conditions: "Only if two students volunteer to stay after school on Fridays to clean the cage."